This is the Corner Score we ran on ReImagine Builders, our own renovation company. Competitor names are hidden.
The best lead capture in your market, but hard to find on Google Maps, web search and AI answers.
You're #2 of 4 in Calgary basements
Head to head on the eight areas we could check for all four.
- 1 Competitor A 65
- 2 You 50
- 3 Competitor B 40
- 4 Competitor C 38
Your 5 biggest gaps. You vs the best of 3 competitors.
Tap one to open its tray.
-
01
SEO
0 of 5You5 of 5Best of 3Competitor A showed for all 5 money searches in our free check. You showed for none.
Opens the SEO tray -
02
Google Maps Search
0You3Best of 3You came 7th and 11th on Google Maps. Competitor A is top 3 on 3 of 5 searches.
Opens the Google Maps Search tray -
03
Social Media
5You100Full marksThe biggest YouTube audience of the four, but your newest video is 3 years old.
Opens the Social Media tray -
04
Google Paid Ads
11 adsYou42 adsBest of 3You run 11 Google ads, all text. Competitor A runs 42.
Opens the Google Paid Ads tray -
05
AI Search
6 (13%)You21 (47%)Best of 3AI tools named you in 13% of answers. Competitor A got 47%.
Opens the AI Search tray
ESTIMATE, with the method shown
What it's costing you
- Not in the Google Maps top 3
- About 1 new Google review a month vs 10
- Named in 13% of AI answers vs 47%
See the method
We will not invent your numbers. Here is how the three biggest gaps turn into money, with the public inputs filled in and your private ones left blank. We fill them in with you on the call.
Not in the Google Maps top 3
- Published click share says the 3 Maps spots take about 48% of clicks (17.6%, 15.4%, 15.1%). Below the top 3 the share drops sharply.
- Monthly Calgary searches for the 5 money terms: ____ (needs a paid keyword tool)
- Share of Maps clicks that become an enquiry: ____ (your call tracking)
searches x about 15% (spot 3) x enquiry rate = extra enquiries a month
About 1 new Google review a month vs 10
- Reviews in the last 90 days, you 5 and Competitor A 10+ in one month (our count)
- Recent reviews are a known Maps ranking factor, so this gap feeds gap 1
counted inside gap 1, not added twice
Named in 13% of AI answers vs 47%
- Our 45-answer test (5 questions, 3 tools, 3 runs)
- Share of your leads that start in an AI tool: ____ (ask new leads "how did you find us")
AI-sourced leads x (47% / 13% - 1) = leads you would add at the leader's rate
Then extra enquiries x your close rate ____ x your average job value ____ = revenue a month. For scale only, your own site quotes most projects at $50,000 to $65,000.
From Published local-pack click-share figures (17.6% / 15.4% / 15.1% for spots 1-3), as quoted in 2025-26 CTR roundups; original study not yet verified by us, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Google Maps, 5 searches from central Calgary (basement development, renovation, finishing, legal basement suite, basement contractors), checked 2 Oct 2026 and Google reviews sorted by newest, each company's profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 and our test of 5 questions x 3 AI tools (Perplexity Sonar, GPT-4o mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash) x 3 runs = 45 answers, checked 2 Oct 2026 and reimaginebuilders.com service page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
How to read the scores
Your overall score is a weighted average of every scored check. The 3 groups regroup the same checks. Reviews, Maps position, lead capture and speed to reply count most, because they move revenue most. Video, social and ads count least. Google Business Page is scored by how much of a 6-point profile checklist you meet, and it counts about as much as the proof on your site. The new social, search and first-screen rows are shown for comparison and do not change any score yet. 2 areas are left out of the score for now, not scored as zero. Meta Ads is never scored, because running no ads is a choice. Speed to Reply is not tested yet.
- Get Found 36 AI Search, SEO, Google Business Page and Google Maps Search
- Get Chosen 69 Website Quality, Reviews, Social Media, Referring Sites and Core Message
- Get the Lead 60 Google Paid Ads, Meta Ads and Speed to Reply
Every score runs from 0 to 100 and comes from things anyone can check from the outside: your website, your Google profile, review sites, social pages, ad libraries and AI answers.
- We never guess
- When we could not see something, we held those points back and marked the score partial. A partial score can only go up once we see the real data.
- Every fact has a source
- Under each finding is where it came from and when we checked it. Click through and see it for yourself.
- Three groups, 12 areas
- Get Found, Get Chosen and Get the Lead. Each area compares you with the same 3 competitors. Sales, jobs, money and your team need a conversation, which is what the 30-minute call is for.
- 80 to 100Strong. Keep it up and keep it consistent.
- 50 to 79Working, with clear gaps worth closing.
- 0 to 49This is where the easy wins are.
All data checked on the evening of 2 October 2026 (Mountain Time) from public sources only.
The 12 areas, each compared with the same 3 competitors. Open one tray at a time.
01 Get Chosen
Website Quality
Working, with clear gaps worth closing.
The best lead capture of the four, but your service page takes 20 seconds to load on a phone.
Speed, lead capture and design
How we fix it
Fix mobile speed first, starting with the service page your ads send people to. Heavy scripts are the likely cause.
Why this one Mobile speed
All checks11 checks (6 good, 4 weak, 1 missing), 2 findings, 9 compared with competitors
Findings
Lead capture is the best of the four: a quote form starts above the fold on phone and desktop, there is a Call button in the phone header, a 1-minute instant price range, a 3-minute detailed plan and a chat assistant. Missing: a self-serve calendar to book the on-site quote, and the form asks about 8 questions, where 3 to 5 is the usual sweet spot.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
On a phone, the home page scores 41 for speed and its main content takes 11.1 seconds to appear. The main service page scores 36 and takes 20.2 seconds. Desktop scores 69 and 70. (Lab test, not real-visitor data.)
From Lighthouse 12 lab test, mobile and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile speed, home pageLab score. Under 50 is slow for everyone here.Lighthouse 12 mobile lab test, run on our server, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 41Best | 25 | 32 | 34 |
| Website basicsMobile-ready, tap-to-call, quote form, trust badges, updated in 2026, fast on mobile. Nobody passes the speed check.Each company's home page; Lighthouse 12 mobile lab test, run on our server, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 5 of 6Best | 5 of 6Best | 5 of 6Best | 3 of 6 |
| Quote form above the fold, phoneCan a phone visitor start a quote without scrolling.Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 | YesBest | No (Quote button) | No | No (Estimate button) |
| Tap-to-call in the phone headerOur page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 | YesBest | YesBest | YesBest | No |
| Chat on the siteOur page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 | Yes, AI chatBest | None found | Yes, live chatBest | Yes, chat widgetBest |
| Project galleryCounted on the main gallery page.Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 339, with before and afterBest | 338, 70 project pages | No gallery link found | 36 |
| Lighthouse accessibility, home pageCan everyone, including people with poor eyesight, use the page.Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 93 | 81 | 82 | 100Best |
| Lighthouse best practices, home pageYours is pulled down by outdated browser features and third-party cookies.Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 61 | 57 | 79Best | 75 |
| Design checklist1 point each. Real project photos, consistent type and colour, no sideways scroll on a phone, readable contrast, clear order of importance.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 4 of 5Best | 4 of 4, photos not scoredBest | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5Best |
What we captured, with where and when
Public pages only, logged out, checked on the evening of 2 Oct 2026 (Calgary time). Times are shown in UTC.
Design checklist
- You
ReImagine Builders
4 of 5
- Real project photos met
Hero image is RB-hosted (hero-rec-room.jpg), not a stock URL; photo vs rendering not verified - Consistent type and colour met
One typeface (Inter), navy/blue palette throughout - No sideways scroll on a phone met
scrollWidth 390 = viewport 390; no sideways scroll - Readable contrast not met
Inline "1,000+ since 2011" link is mid-blue on the dark blue hero, low contrast at both widths - Clear order of importance met
Headline > subhead > proof line > form, in that order
Seen on reimaginebuilders.com on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC (phone view 04:06 UTC).
- Real project photos met
- Comp A
Competitor A
4 of 4, photos not scored
- Real project photos not scored
- Consistent type and colour met
- No sideways scroll on a phone met
- Readable contrast met
- Clear order of importance met
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
3 of 5
- Real project photos met
- Consistent type and colour met
- No sideways scroll on a phone met
- Readable contrast not met
- Clear order of importance not met
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
4 of 5
- Real project photos met
- Consistent type and colour not met
- No sideways scroll on a phone met
- Readable contrast met
- Clear order of importance met
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
Lighthouse scores (phone, lab test)
- Good
Accessibility
93 home, 96 service page
Small misses too. Some text is low contrast and some tap targets sit too close together.
From Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Best practices
61 home, 61 service page
The page loads scripts that use outdated browser features and set third-party cookies. Usually tracking or widget code; trimming it also helps speed.
From Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Missing
Speed
41 home, 36 service page
About 2.7 MB of page and 5 seconds of JavaScript work before a phone can respond. The main content takes 11 to 20 seconds to show on a mid-range phone.
From Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Lead capture
- Good
Quote form above the fold
Yes, phone and desktop
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Tap-to-call on phones
Yes, Call button in the header
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Instant pricing tool
Yes, 1-minute range, 3-minute plan
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
- Weak
Online booking
No self-serve calendar found
People who want the on-site quote must wait for a call back. A booking link lets them pick a time at 10 pm.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Form length
About 8 questions
Every extra question loses some people. Ask 3 to 5 up front and the rest on the call.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Price, proof and trust
- Good
Project gallery
339 large photos, before-and-after sliders
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Testimonials
Google reviews on the site; no video testimonials or written case studies found
A 60-second client video and one written case study per year of work prove the 13-week promise better than stars.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
02 Get Found
AI Search
This is where the easy wins are.
AI tools named you in 13% of answers. Competitor A got 47%.
Do AI assistants name you
What it's costing you ESTIMATE, with the method shown
Named in 13% of AI answers vs 47%
- Our 45-answer test (5 questions, 3 tools, 3 runs)
- Share of your leads that start in an AI tool: ____ (ask new leads "how did you find us")
AI-sourced leads x (47% / 13% - 1) = leads you would add at the leader's rate
Then extra enquiries x your close rate ____ x your average job value ____ = revenue a month. For scale only, your own site quotes most projects at $50,000 to $65,000.
How we fix it
Get into AI answers: ask to be added to the Calgary "best of" lists those tools quote, build up Houzz and BBB reviews, and publish a clear comparison page.
Why this one AI search
All checks1 checks (1 weak), 1 findings, 1 compared with competitors
Findings
AI search, 45 answers (5 questions, 3 tools, 3 runs each): you were named in 6 (13%), all by Perplexity, for "best basement development companies" and "who builds legal basement suites". Competitor A was named in 21 (47%), by all three tools. ChatGPT and Gemini never named you.
From our test of 5 questions x 3 AI tools (Perplexity Sonar, GPT-4o mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash) x 3 runs = 45 answers, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named by AI assistants5 questions x 3 AI tools x 3 runs. You were named only by Perplexity.our test of 5 questions x 3 AI tools (Perplexity Sonar, GPT-4o mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash) x 3 runs = 45 answers, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 6 (13%) | 21 (47%)Best | 7 (16%) | 1 (2%) |
Rankings for 5 money searches
- Weak
AI answers
6 of 45 (13%), Perplexity only
ChatGPT and Gemini lean on directory and "best of" lists, where you are thin (Houzz 1 review, BBB 0).
From our test of 5 questions x 3 AI tools (Perplexity Sonar, GPT-4o mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash) x 3 runs = 45 answers, checked 2 Oct 2026.
03 Get Found
SEO
This is where the easy wins are.
partialCompetitor A showed for all 5 money searches in our free check. You showed for none.
Do you show up in web search
How we fix it
Buy a proper Calgary rank check (pennies per search) and track the 5 money searches monthly. Our free check did not find you, but it uses a US index.
Why this one Web searches
All checks8 checks (5 good, 1 weak, 1 missing, 1 note), 2 findings, 5 compared with competitors
Findings
Web search, 5 money searches (free tool, US index, so not the real Calgary page): Competitor A showed in the top 9 for all 5, you and the other two for none.
From our test of 5 web searches, top 9 results (US index, not Google Calgary), checked 2 Oct 2026.
The search engine setup is strong: 93 out of 100, with structured business data, an FAQ, 180 blog posts and 3 town pages. One miss: the home page headline has no search keyword in it. Lighthouse also scores the site 100 for SEO and 93 to 96 for accessibility, but only 59 to 61 for best practices, because the page uses outdated browser features and third-party cookies (mostly from tracking and widget scripts).
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026 and reimaginebuilders.com service page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google search, top resultsIn the top 9 for the 5 money searches. Free tool, US index, so a rough signal only.our test of 5 web searches, top 9 results (US index, not Google Calgary), checked 2 Oct 2026 | 0 of 5 | 5 of 5Best | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 |
| Lighthouse SEO, home pageTechnical search setup. Competitor A loses points for missing image descriptions and links Google cannot follow.Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 100Best | 85 | 92 | 100Best |
| Pages in the sitemap (stand-in for indexed pages)Google's site: search was blocked by its captcha, so we counted the pages each site lists in its sitemap instead.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 215Best | not measured, sitemap blocked | 49 | 16 |
| Town pagesDedicated pages for towns around Calgary.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 3, Airdrie, Chestermere, Okotoks | 5, Airdrie, Cochrane, Okotoks, Chestermere, High RiverBest | 0 | 0 |
| BacklinksLinks from other sites. Counting them needs a paid tool.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | not measured, needs a paid tool | not measured, needs a paid tool | not measured, needs a paid tool | not measured, needs a paid tool |
What we captured, with where and when
Public pages only, logged out, checked on the evening of 2 Oct 2026 (Calgary time). Times are shown in UTC.
Pages in the sitemap (stand-in for indexed pages)
- You
- Comp A
Competitor A
not measured, sitemap blocked
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:10 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
49
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:10 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
16
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:10 UTC.
Town pages
- You
ReImagine Builders
3, Airdrie, Chestermere, Okotoks
Seen on reimaginebuilders.com/sitemap.xml on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:10 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
5, Airdrie, Cochrane, Okotoks, Chestermere, High River
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:14 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
0
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:10 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
0
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:10 UTC.
Backlinks
- You
ReImagine Builders
not measured, needs a paid tool
Not captured, so there is no page or time to show.
- Comp A
Competitor A
not measured, needs a paid tool
Not captured, so there is no page or time to show.
- Comp B
Competitor B
not measured, needs a paid tool
Not captured, so there is no page or time to show.
- Comp C
Competitor C
not measured, needs a paid tool
Not captured, so there is no page or time to show.
Lighthouse scores (phone, lab test)
- Good
SEO
100 home, 100 service page
From Lighthouse 12 lab test (SEO, accessibility, best practices, speed), phone, checked 2 Oct 2026.
On-page checks
- Good
Page titles
"Calgary Basement Development | ReImagine Builders..." (62 characters) and "Basement Development Calgary | ReImagine Builders"
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Meta descriptions
Present on both pages
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Main headline (H1)
The home page says "See your basement before you build it." The service page says "Calgary basement development, planned to the day."
The home headline has no search words in it. Google leans on the headline to understand the page; "Calgary basement development" in it would help.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Structured data (schema)
GeneralContractor, LocalBusiness, Service, Offer, FAQ, Breadcrumbs, rating 4.9 from 168
One small fix. The rating count says 168 while Google shows 171.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Sitemap and robots file
Sitemap with 215 pages, linked from the robots file
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Note
Internal links
24 links to your own pages from each page checked
Competitor A has 47 from its home page. More links from the home page to town and service pages spread ranking strength.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Rankings for 5 money searches
- Missing
Web search (US index)
0 of 5 in the top 9
Our free tool uses a US index, not Google Calgary. A paid Calgary check costs pennies and is the first thing to buy.
From our test of 5 web searches, top 9 results (US index, not Google Calgary), checked 2 Oct 2026.
04 Get Found
Google Business Page
Strong. Keep it up and keep it consistent.
Your profile meets all 6 checks and shows 260+ photos. You replied to 8 of your newest 10 reviews. Competitor A and Competitor B replied to all 10.
Is your Google profile complete
How we fix it
Keep the profile as it is and reply to every new review, the way Competitor A and Competitor B replied to all of their newest 10.
All checks8 compared with competitors
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profile checklist metWorked out from the rows below. Main category set, 50 or more photos, an owner post in the 30 days before we checked, hours listed, website linked, and owner replies on 8 or more of the newest 10 reviews.Worked out from the captured rows | 6 of 6Best | 5 of 5, photos not shownBest | 6 of 6Best | 4 of 6 |
| Photos on the listingAs labelled on the public listing ("N+ Photos").Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 260+Best | not shown | 118+ | 83+ |
| Owner replies, newest 10 reviewsNewest 10 Google reviews, sorted by newest.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 8 of 10 | 10 of 10Best | 10 of 10Best | 9 of 10 |
| Newest owner postRead from the "From the owner" block. Logged out, Google shows no separate Updates tab.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 14 Sep 2026 | about 2 Oct 2026 (12 hours ago) | about 2 Oct 2026 (13 hours ago) | none shown |
| Hours listedCaptured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, the listing shows "Add hours" |
| Website linkedYour link goes to the Calgary service page with a tracking tag.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Main categoryCaptured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | General contractor | General contractor | General contractor | General contractor |
| Extra categoriesThe public listing shows only the main category.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
What we captured, with where and when
Public pages only, logged out, checked on the evening of 2 Oct 2026 (Calgary time). Times are shown in UTC.
Profile checklist, item by item
- You
ReImagine Builders
- Main category set met
- 50 or more photos met
- Owner post in the last 30 days met
- Hours listed met
- Website linked met
- Owner replies on 8 or more of the newest 10 reviews met
- Comp A
Competitor A
- Main category set met
- 50 or more photos not shown, held back
- Owner post in the last 30 days met
- Hours listed met
- Website linked met
- Owner replies on 8 or more of the newest 10 reviews met
- Comp B
Competitor B
- Main category set met
- 50 or more photos met
- Owner post in the last 30 days met
- Hours listed met
- Website linked met
- Owner replies on 8 or more of the newest 10 reviews met
- Comp C
Competitor C
- Main category set met
- 50 or more photos met
- Owner post in the last 30 days not met
- Hours listed not met
- Website linked met
- Owner replies on 8 or more of the newest 10 reviews met
Photos on the listing
- You
ReImagine Builders
260+
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:12 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
not shown
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
118+
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
83+
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
Owner replies, newest 10 reviews
- You
ReImagine Builders
8 of 10
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 03:16 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
10 of 10
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
10 of 10
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 03:17 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
9 of 10
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 03:18 UTC.
Newest owner post
- You
ReImagine Builders
14 Sep 2026
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:12 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
about 2 Oct 2026 (12 hours ago)
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
about 2 Oct 2026 (13 hours ago)
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
none shown
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
Hours listed
- You
ReImagine Builders
Yes
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:12 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
Yes
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
Yes
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
No, the listing shows "Add hours"
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
Website linked
- You
ReImagine Builders
Yes
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:12 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
Yes
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
Yes
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
Yes
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
Main category
- You
ReImagine Builders
General contractor
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:12 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
General contractor
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
General contractor
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
General contractor
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
Extra categories
- You
ReImagine Builders
not measured
Seen on google.com/maps/place/ReImagine+Builders/@51.0125833,-114... on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:12 UTC.
- Comp A
Competitor A
not measured
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:08 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
not measured
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
not measured
Google Maps, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:13 UTC.
05 Get Found
Google Maps Search
This is where the easy wins are.
You came 7th and 11th on Google Maps. Competitor A is top 3 on 3 of 5 searches.
Where you rank on Google Maps
What it's costing you ESTIMATE, with the method shown
Not in the Google Maps top 3
- Published click share says the 3 Maps spots take about 48% of clicks (17.6%, 15.4%, 15.1%). Below the top 3 the share drops sharply.
- Monthly Calgary searches for the 5 money terms: ____ (needs a paid keyword tool)
- Share of Maps clicks that become an enquiry: ____ (your call tracking)
searches x about 15% (spot 3) x enquiry rate = extra enquiries a month
Then extra enquiries x your close rate ____ x your average job value ____ = revenue a month. For scale only, your own site quotes most projects at $50,000 to $65,000.
How we fix it
Win the Maps pack: ask every finished client for a Google review the week of handover (you get about 1 a month now, Competitor A about 10), keep replying to all of them, and post project photos to the profile weekly.
Why this one Maps position, reviews in the last 90 days
All checks1 checks (1 missing), 1 findings, 1 compared with competitors
Findings
Google Maps, 5 searches run from central Calgary on 2 Oct: you came 7th for "basement development calgary" and 11th for "basement renovation calgary", and were not in the first 8 to 11 results for "basement finishing", "legal basement suite" or "basement contractors". Competitor A was in the top 3 for 3 of the 5. An earlier check the same evening put you 3rd for "basement development calgary", so Maps order moves with where and how the search is made.
From Google Maps, 5 searches from central Calgary (basement development, renovation, finishing, legal basement suite, basement contractors), checked 2 Oct 2026 and Google Maps, 'basement development Calgary' and 'basement renovation Calgary', checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Maps, top 3Searches from central Calgary. Positions for development, renovation, finishing, legal suite, contractors (- = not in the first 8 to 11).Google Maps, 5 searches from central Calgary (basement development, renovation, finishing, legal basement suite, basement contractors), checked 2 Oct 2026 | 0 (7, 11, -, -, -) | 3 (1, 2, 6, 6, 1)Best | 0 (9, 9, -, -, -) | 2 (3, 1, 5, -, 5) |
Rankings for 5 money searches
- Missing
Google Maps
development 7th, renovation 11th, finishing / legal suite / contractors not in the first 8 to 11
Maps weighs closeness, review count and how recent reviews are. Competitor A has 300 reviews and about 10 new ones a month.
From Google Maps, 5 searches from central Calgary (basement development, renovation, finishing, legal basement suite, basement contractors), checked 2 Oct 2026.
06 Get Chosen
Reviews
Working, with clear gaps worth closing.
partial4.9 stars from 171 reviews, but 5 new ones in 90 days. Competitor A got 10 or more in one month.
Count, rating, recency and owner replies
What it's costing you ESTIMATE, with the method shown
About 1 new Google review a month vs 10
- Reviews in the last 90 days, you 5 and Competitor A 10+ in one month (our count)
- Recent reviews are a known Maps ranking factor, so this gap feeds gap 1
counted inside gap 1, not added twice
Then extra enquiries x your close rate ____ x your average job value ____ = revenue a month. For scale only, your own site quotes most projects at $50,000 to $65,000.
How we fix it
Win the Maps pack: ask every finished client for a Google review the week of handover (you get about 1 a month now, Competitor A about 10), keep replying to all of them, and post project photos to the profile weekly.
Why this one Maps position, reviews in the last 90 days
Turn your Google reviews into content. 42 mention scheduling and 37 mention budget: that is ready-made proof for posts and ads.
Why this one Google reviews
Start a referral program. You have more than 1,000 past clients (by your count) and 171 Google reviewers, and no way for them to send a friend.
Why this one Referrals
All checks2 checks (1 good, 1 weak), 3 findings, 4 compared with competitors
Findings
Google shows 4.9 stars from 171 reviews (164 five-star, 1 one-star).
From Google Maps business profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Google reviews, newest first, show 5 in roughly the last 90 days (newest 2 weeks ago), 4 of those 5 have an owner reply, and 143 of the 150 we could load have one (95%). Competitor A had 10 in the last month alone, all replied.
From Google reviews sorted by newest, each company's profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
No public referral program or referral reward was found.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google reviewsCount and star rating on each Google Business Profile.Each company's Google Business Profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 171 (4.9★) | 300 (4.9★)Best | 41 (5.0★) | 93 (5.0★) |
| Google reviews, last 90 daysCounted from newest-first lists. Competitor A had 10 in the last month (our scroll stopped there, so 10 is a floor).Google reviews sorted by newest, each company's profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 5 | 10+Best | 0 | 0 |
| Owner replies to Google reviewsEveryone here replies. Keep it up.Google reviews sorted by newest, each company's profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 95% (143 of 150) | 100% (10 of 10)Best | 100% (41 of 41)Best | 99% (92 of 93) |
| Newest Google reviewAge as Google shows it.Each company's Google Business Profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 2 weeksBest | 3 days | 3 months | 4 months |
Reviews
- Weak
Google, last 90 days
5 reviews, 4 with your reply
Competitor A got 10 in the last month. Recent reviews help Maps rank and reassure buyers.
From Google reviews sorted by newest, each company's profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Google reply rate
95% (143 of 150 loaded)
From Google reviews sorted by newest, each company's profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
08 Get Chosen
Referring Sites
Working, with clear gaps worth closing.
115 HomeStars reviews, but the newest is from January 2025. Houzz has 1 review and BBB has none.
HomeStars, BBB, Houzz and other listings
How we fix it
Restart HomeStars reviews by adding its link to the review request you already send. Google keeps getting new ones (the newest is a month old); HomeStars has had none since January 2025.
Why this one HomeStars
Fill the empty review sites, starting with Houzz and BBB.
Why this one Other review sites are thin
Fix the four mismatches. Use one review number everywhere (it can update itself from Google), correct the BBB founding date, and rename and re-price the Houzz profile.
Why this one Four facts do not match
All checks5 checks (2 weak, 2 missing, 1 note), 3 findings, 1 compared with competitors
Findings
HomeStars shows 5 out of 5 from 115 reviews and 8 Best Of awards, but the newest review is from 18 January 2025, about 20 months ago.
From HomeStars profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Other review sites are thin: Houzz has 1 review, BBB has 0 (rated A+), and Facebook shows 84% recommend from 5 reviews.
From Houzz profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 and BBB profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Facebook page (logged out), checked 2 Oct 2026.
Four facts do not match: reviews read 160+ on the site, 168 in the page code and 171 on Google. BBB says founded 2009, the site says 2011. Houzz still uses the old name, ReImagine Basements, with an older $30,500 to $60,000 price. Facebook shows a price range of "££".
From Side-by-side check of the site, Google, BBB, Houzz and Facebook, checked 2 Oct 2026 and BBB profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Houzz profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Facebook page (logged out), checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HomeStars reviewsYour newest HomeStars review is from Jan 2025.HomeStars profiles, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 115 | 198Best | Profile inactive | Not measured |
Reviews
- Missing
HomeStars recency
Newest review 18 January 2025
20 months with nothing new reads as inactive to HomeStars visitors.
From HomeStars profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Listing consistency
- Missing
- Weak
Review count
Site 160+, schema 168, Google 171
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Google Maps business profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
- Note
Address and phone
Not compared across all listings yet
Needs a listings tool or a manual pass on the call.
09 Get Chosen
Core Message
Strong. Keep it up and keep it consistent.
The only one of the four that publishes prices. Your biggest claims still need outside proof.
How clearly you explain yourself
How we fix it
Put the 13-week guarantee on every profile. Facebook only says "Guaranteed Timeline" and LinkedIn does not mention it.
Why this one Your strongest promise
Get "1,000+ basements" and the on-time rate confirmed by someone else, for example a stat on HomeStars or a published count of permits.
Why this one Self-reported claims
All checks5 checks (2 good, 3 weak), 4 findings, 4 compared with competitors
Findings
You say what you do and where: basement development, basement design and legal suites, with financing, in Calgary, Airdrie, Okotoks and Chestermere. Each town has its own page.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Prices are public. Bands run from $40k to $60k up to $85k and over, and $75k to $125k for a legal suite. There are three ways to get a price: a 1-minute range, a 3-minute plan, or an on-site fixed quote.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026 and reimaginebuilders.com service page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Your strongest promise is the 13-week finish, with $500 a week paid if it runs late. It sits above the fold, and Google reviews back it up: 42 mention scheduling and 14 mention keeping to the timeline.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Google Maps business profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
"1,000+ basements" and a "near 100%" on-time rate are self-reported. Nothing outside your own site confirms them yet.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices publishedPrice ranges on the home or main service page.Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 | Yes, plus instant range toolBest | None found | None found | None found |
| Warranty and financing statedOur page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 5-yr warranty, FinanceitBest | 5-yr warranty, FinanceITBest | 5-yr limited, FinanceitBest | Neither found |
| Headline on the first screenThe main headline (H1), quoted as captured.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | "See your basement before you build it." | Hidden in this public sample | Hidden in this public sample | Hidden in this public sample |
| Core message checklist1 point each. Says what and where, who it is for or what makes you different, proof, one clear main call to action, and that call to action visible on a phone without scrolling.Captured 2 Oct 2026 (3 Oct UTC). Page and time for each value are listed below | 5 of 5Best | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
What we captured, with where and when
Public pages only, logged out, checked on the evening of 2 Oct 2026 (Calgary time). Times are shown in UTC.
Headline on the first screen
- You
ReImagine Builders
"See your basement before you build it."
Seen on reimaginebuilders.com on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC (phone view 04:06 UTC).
- Comp A
Competitor A
Hidden in this public sample
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
Hidden in this public sample
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
Hidden in this public sample
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
Core message checklist
- You
ReImagine Builders
5 of 5
- Says what and where met
Subhead, "Calgary basements designed in photorealistic detail..." - Who it is for, or what makes you different met
Differentiator, see it before you build + completion date guaranteed in writing - Proof met
"1,000+ basements, 4.9★, 13 weeks, $0 deposit" under the headline - One clear main call to action met
Free Quote form / "Get Your Free Quote" is the filled primary button (Instant Estimate and Ask Basement Genius compete at 390) - Call to action on a phone without scrolling met
Sticky "Free Quote →" bar at y=792 of 844 at 390
Seen on reimaginebuilders.com on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC (phone view 04:06 UTC).
- Says what and where met
- Comp A
Competitor A
3 of 5
- Says what and where met
- Who it is for, or what makes you different not met
- Proof met
- One clear main call to action not met
- Call to action on a phone without scrolling met
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC.
- Comp B
Competitor B
4 of 5
- Says what and where met
- Who it is for, or what makes you different not met
- Proof met
- One clear main call to action met
- Call to action on a phone without scrolling met
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
- Comp C
Competitor C
2 of 5
- Says what and where not met
- Who it is for, or what makes you different not met
- Proof not met
- One clear main call to action met
- Call to action on a phone without scrolling met
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
Price, proof and trust
- Good
Prices published
Yes, $40k to $60k, $60k to $85k, $85k+, legal suite $75k to $125k
From reimaginebuilders.com home page, checked 2 Oct 2026 and reimaginebuilders.com service page, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Price mismatches
The service page says "most $50,000 to $65,000, from $40,000". Houzz says $30,500 to $60,000. Facebook shows "££"
Different numbers in different places make a buyer wonder which one is real.
From reimaginebuilders.com service page, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Houzz profile, checked 2 Oct 2026 and Facebook page (logged out), checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Good
Warranty, BBB, financing
5-year warranty, A+ BBB, Financeit
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Licence, insurance, WCB
Not stated on the pages checked
Homeowners are told to ask for these. Saying it up front removes a question.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026.
- Weak
Years in business
The site says since 2011. BBB says founded 2009
Two founding years on public listings is a small trust leak. Pick one and fix the other.
From Our page check of each home page and main service page, phone and desktop, checked 2 Oct 2026 and BBB profile, checked 2 Oct 2026.
10 Get the Lead
Google Paid Ads
Working, with clear gaps worth closing.
partialYou run 11 Google ads, all text. Competitor A runs 42.
Ads on Google search
How we fix it
Turn your Google reviews into content. 42 mention scheduling and 37 mention budget: that is ready-made proof for posts and ads.
Why this one Google reviews
All checks1 checks (1 note), 1 findings, 1 compared with competitors
Findings
Google Ads are running: 11 text ads for your site in Canada, 7 of them shown between 29 September and 2 October 2026. All are text ads, no image or video formats. We do not score you down for which ad channels you skip; only for the quality of what runs.
From Google Ads Transparency Center, Canada, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AdsAll ads Google lists for each website in Canada.Google Ads Transparency Center, Canada, by website, checked 2 Oct 2026 | 11 ads | 42 adsBest | 8 ads, incl. video | 4 ads |
Video, social and ads
- Note
Google Ads
11 text ads, 7 shown 29 Sep to 2 Oct
The ad wording is shown as images in Google's library, so we have not judged it yet.
From Google Ads Transparency Center, Canada, checked 2 Oct 2026.
11 Get the Lead
Meta Ads
No Facebook or Instagram ads found. Competitor B runs 1.
Ads on Facebook and Instagram
How we fix it
Once Maps and AI search are moving, test Facebook and Instagram ads. Your renderings and before-and-after photos are made for them, and the pixel is already installed.
Why this one No Meta ads
All checks1 checks (1 note), 1 findings, 1 compared with competitors
Findings
No Facebook or Instagram ads were found in Meta's public ad library. That is a choice, not a fault, and it is not scored.
From Meta Ad Library, Canada, keyword search, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Not scored. Running no ads is a choice, so it is never marked down.
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta (Facebook, Instagram) adsSearch by website name, so ads that never mention it can be missed.Meta Ad Library, Canada, search by website, checked 2 Oct 2026 | None found | None found | 1 activeBest | None found |
Video, social and ads
- Note
Meta ads
None running
Not scored. Skipping a channel is a choice.
From Meta Ad Library, Canada, keyword search, checked 2 Oct 2026.
12 Get the Lead
Speed to Reply
Not tested yet for any of the four. It is the first thing we test with you.
How fast a new enquiry hears back
How we fix it
The fastest way to win more of the leads you already get: answer first, follow up every time, and see every lead in one place.
All checks1 compared with competitors
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
| Metric | Youreimaginebuilders.com | Competitor AMarket leader | Competitor BMarket leader | Competitor CSimilar size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed to replyMeasured with a test enquiry; available on request. | Not tested yet | Not tested yet | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
13
How we checked
Only public data was used. What we could not see is held back, not scored against you.
How we checked, and what we could not see yet
The same public checks, run the same evening, on the two strongest basement companies in Calgary and one company closer to your size. The best value in each row is marked. How we picked them. The two leaders top the Google Maps results for basement searches in Calgary and are named most often by AI assistants. The third is the closest basement specialist to your size by Google review count.
The 3 biggest gaps to the best in your market
- On Maps, Competitor A is top 3 on 3 of 5 money searches. You are top 3 on none (7th and 11th at best in this check).
- On reviews, they collect about 10 new Google reviews a month, you about 1 to 2.
- In AI and web search, they are named in 47% of AI answers and top 9 on all 5 searches. You got 13% and none.
You lead with the only quote form above the fold, the only published prices, the fastest mobile home page of the four (41), and the biggest YouTube audience (391).
This audit only uses what anyone can see from the outside. Here is what we could not see yet, and why. None of these are scored against you; the points are simply held back.
Real Google rankings in Calgary
needs a paid search data tool, so section 03 rankings are low confidence
Website traffic
needs a paid traffic estimate, or your own Google Analytics
Real-visitor speed data
we ran a lab test; Google's own field data was not pulled
Instagram and TikTok
Instagram needs a login to view and TikTok could not be confirmed
How often you post on Facebook
a logged-out visitor sees one post only
Google profile photos, posts and competitors' review counts
not shown to logged-out visitors
When your Google Ads started and where they send people
the public ad library shows only the last date shown
Your goals
nothing public states them, and that is a conversation, not a search
How the four compare
Each company is scored with the same rules as your Corner Score, on the eight areas we could measure for all four, captured between 02:58 and 04:14 UTC on 3 Oct 2026. Any check we could not see for even one company is left out for everyone. Areas count by the same weights as your Corner Score, so this number differs from your 60.
| Area, out of 100 | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Maps position, 5 money searchesEach search scores 20 for the top 3, 10 for 4 to 10 and 4 for 11 to 20. Lists showed 8 to 11 results, and a company not in the list scores 0, the same for everyone. | 14 | 80 | 20 | 60 |
| Google reviews, rating and volume30 rating 4.8+, 25 review count against the leader (300, pro rata), 15 a review in the last 30 days, 15 owner replies on 80%+. Out of 85 (posts and photos dropped). | 87 | 100 | 57 | 62 |
| Google Business Page, 5-point checklistShare of 5 items met, which are main category, owner post within 30 days, hours, website link, replies on 8+ of the newest 10. Photos dropped. | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
| Website lead capture25 quote form above the fold on a phone, 20 tap-to-call in the phone header, 15 chat, 10 online booking. Out of 70 (instant price tool and form length dropped). | 86 | 29 | 50 | 21 |
| Mobile site speedLighthouse mobile performance, home and main service page averaged. | 39 | 28 | 36 | 40 |
| Site healthAverage of Lighthouse SEO, accessibility and best practices, phone, home and service page. | 85 | 74 | 87 | 92 |
| Google search, 5 money searchesEach search scores 20 for the top 3, 12 for 4 to 10 and 4 for 11 to 20. Free tool on the US index with the top 9 links read, and a company not listed scores 0, the same for everyone. | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| AI search answersShare of the same 45 answers (5 questions, 3 AI tools, 3 runs) that name the company. | 13 | 47 | 16 | 2 |
| Comparison score | 50#2 | 65#1 | 40#3 | 38#4 |
Left out of the comparison, and why
- Offer clarity, What makes you different, Price, quality, speed and trust proof, Price transparency. Scored for ReImagine from a full read of its site; that read was not done for the 3 competitors.
- Listing consistency. Name, founding year and review count were cross-checked across directories for ReImagine only.
- Google reviews, last 90 days and replies. Half the points compare 90-day review counts with the leader. Competitor A' count stopped at the 10 reviews we could load, so the leader number is unknown.
- Other review sites. Houzz was not measured for any competitor and HomeStars was not measured for Competitor C.
- Proof on the site. Before and after, video testimonials and case studies were not checked on competitor sites.
- Trust signals. Only warranty and financing were checked on competitor sites, not BBB, years in business or licence and insurance.
- Video and social. Instagram showed a login wall for everyone, and posting rhythm needs a paid tool.
- On-page SEO. Competitor A blocks its sitemap, so the sitemap and content depth points could not be checked for it.
- Referrals. Referral programs were not checked on competitor sites.
- Google Ads. Ad formats, how long ads have run and landing page match were not recorded the same way for all four.
- Speed to reply. Not tested for anyone yet.
- Meta Ads. Never scored, by rule (not running is not a fault).
Your 30-minute call covers the rest
Your 30-minute call covers the four areas no outside check can see. We record it (with your OK) and add what we learn as part two of this report.
Conversion and sales
How fast you answer new leads, how quotes are built and followed up, and what gets automated.
Jobs and fulfillment
How jobs run, hiring, and quality control.
Financial
Bookkeeping, cash flow tracking, and the numbers (KPIs) you watch each week.
Internal
Customer service, the office, reception, team communication and file handling.
How we fix it
The fastest way to win more of the leads you already get: answer first, follow up every time, and see every lead in one place.
14
Start here with speed to lead
Answer first, follow up every time, and see every lead in one place.
Start here with speed to lead
The fastest way to win more of the leads you already get: answer first, follow up every time, and see every lead in one place.
Instant reply
Every new enquiry gets a helpful, human-sounding reply right away, day or night.
Automatic follow-up
Leads who go quiet get a friendly nudge on a schedule you choose, so nobody slips through.
Quote page
A clean web page for every quote. You already have one; we would connect it to everything above.
Lead dashboard
Every lead, where it came from and where it stands, on one screen.
You can build this yourself with the tools out there today. The reason not to is time: it needs testing, tuning and watching as the tools change every month. That is the job we do, so you do not have to.
07 Get Chosen
Social Media
This is where the easy wins are.
partialThe biggest YouTube audience of the four, but your newest video is 3 years old.
YouTube, Instagram and Facebook
How we fix it
Bring YouTube back with short videos. You already make renderings and design videos for every quote.
Why this one YouTube
Link Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn from the site footer, and update the LinkedIn description.
Why this one Site links
See our plan, starting with speed to lead
All checks3 checks (2 weak, 1 note), 3 findings, 5 compared with competitors
Findings
YouTube has 391 subscribers and 13 videos. The newest upload is 3 years old.
From YouTube channel ↗, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Facebook has 1.2K followers. The only post a logged-out visitor sees is from 19 December 2024.
From Facebook page (logged out) ↗, checked 2 Oct 2026.
The site links only to Facebook and Houzz. Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn are not linked, and LinkedIn still describes detached garage builds.
From reimaginebuilders.com home page ↗, checked 2 Oct 2026 and LinkedIn company page ↗, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Score breakdown
You vs the 3 competitors
What we captured, with where and when
Public pages only, logged out, checked on the evening of 2 Oct 2026 (Calgary time). Times are shown in UTC.
Facebook and Instagram linked from the home page
ReImagine Builders
No
Seen on reimaginebuilders.com ↗ on 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC.
Competitor A
Yes, both
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:06 UTC.
Competitor B
Yes, both
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
Competitor C
Yes, both
their website, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:07 UTC.
Facebook followers
ReImagine Builders
1.2K, not linked from your site
Seen on facebook.com/reimaginebuilders ↗ on 3 Oct 2026 at 01:42 UTC.
Competitor A
2,079
Facebook, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Competitor B
542
Facebook, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Competitor C
233
Facebook, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Facebook newest visible post
ReImagine Builders
19 Dec 2024
Seen on facebook.com/reimaginebuilders ↗ on 3 Oct 2026 at 01:42 UTC.
Competitor A
25 Sep (year not shown)
Facebook, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Competitor B
18 Sep (year not shown)
Facebook, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Competitor C
12 Aug (year not shown)
Facebook, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Instagram
ReImagine Builders
login wall, not linked from your site
Seen on instagram.com/reimaginebuilders ↗ on 3 Oct 2026 at 01:42 UTC.
Competitor A
login wall, not measured
Instagram, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Competitor B
profile not available
Instagram, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Competitor C
login wall, not measured
Instagram, captured 3 Oct 2026 at 04:09 UTC.
Video, social and ads
YouTube
391 subscribers, 13 videos, newest 3 years ago
From YouTube channel ↗, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Facebook
1.2K followers, newest visible post December 2024
From Facebook page (logged out) ↗, checked 2 Oct 2026.
Instagram, TikTok
Not visible without logging in